Why did so many MPs claim expenses which, although apparently ‘within the rules’, were clearly not morally justifiable? It has been suggested that this was a conformity effect, as research has shown that bending the rules or breaking social norms increases, sometimes doubling, if people see that others are doing this. It’s a ‘me too’ effect, or what we know as conformity. But does this social influence justify the unethical or questionable behaviour? That is a different question, and it seems that we, the public, expect our MPs to think and not just follow the herd. Read more here.
2014 National curriculum about accountability A Level A Level Psychology algebra ALL analysis Anne Watson AQA A Level psychology arts assessment assessment without levels Attachment brain case studies classroom comprehension concepts/language confirmation bias critical thinking curriculum david crystal debbie barton depression DfE dictionary Digital drama ed-tech Education english ethics exam preparation exams false friends Freud GCSE genes guided reading history human sciences implications independent reading Jill Carter John Mason knowledge claims knowledge questions KS1 KS2 KS3 language learning literacy literature Mastery mathematics maths maths education maths mastery media memory methodology Milgram natural sciences Ofsted oxford owl perspectives primary Primary assessment and accountability Professional Development progress psychology Rachel Hawke reading reading for pleasure Rebecca Priest Rebecca Veals research researchED revision schizophrenia science secondary shakespeare shared knowledge statistics steve fearnley Stress teaching teaching mathematics technology TOK emotion TOK intuition TOK language TOK reason TOK sense perception TOK ways of knowing truth writing